FIRST TIME IN HISTORY UPSC HAS PROVIDED ANSWERSHEET OF CSP-2011, AND EVEN IN THAT THEIR FRAUD HAS BEEN CAUGHT.

The CSP-2011 candidate Rajendra Rawat  has been informed by UPSC that he has  scored 1.34 marks (out of 200) in papre-I of CSP-2011 . But, according to ANSWERSHEET(OMR SHEET) and ANSWER KEY provided  by UPSC , he has actually scored 72.67.{ in paper -II  he was informed correct score .i.e.
157.50. so his actual total score comes out to be 231 marks (out of 400) and cut off for his OBC category as informed by UPSC was 175. still he was disqualified in CSP -2011.}

ANSWERSHEETS(OMR SHEET) AND ANSWER-KEYS PROVIDED BY UPSC UNDER RTI ARE GIVEN BELOW:-

FOR MORE DETAILS OF FRAUD GOING ON IN UPSC VISIT FOLLOWING GOOGLE DOCUMENTS:- https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B3Alege3ImJNUnFic2lPY2NUZ2s/edit

SUPPORT OUR CAUSE BY SIGNING FOLLOWING PETITION WHICH WILL BE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT:-http://www.change.org/petitions/irregularities-in-the-indian-civil-services-examination

THOSE FRIENDS WHO HAVE SOME CONTACT WITH MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT CAN ASK THEM TO RAISE FOLLOWING QUESTION IN PARLIAMENT:-

Questions to be asked to Minister of Personnel , Public Grievances and Pensions in Parliament of India in context of UPSC’s functioning

Answers of following specific questions is demanded with all the relevant documents—

1-What is the stand of Minister and UPSC head with respect to increased litigation against the institution on transparency & accountability in its Civil Services Examination? Are not they concerned and taking some meaningful corrective actions in the interest of credibility of institution in public-perception?

2-What steps minister and UPSC head has taken to comply with the RTI Act and Public Record Act,passed by this Parliament ,in letter and spirit?

3-Is it correct that under current chairman of UPSC,CIC and courts of higher judiciary has passed adverse strictures against the UPSC for not complying with judgments/orders/directives passed on RTI matters and keep spending the public money on litigation and re-litigation? If this is right then what assurance can be given to make sure that same would not happen again and UPSC will comply with the current jurisdiction of RTI Act and its related case-laws, without judging itself out, as there is no explicit exemption given by Parliament or Executive or Judiciary at the moment?

4-Is it right that irrespective of being asked by National Archives of India(NAI) many times, UPSC refused to send its Record Retention Schedule to NAI for vetting, as required under Public Record Act and Central Secretariat Manual of Office Procedure? On what basis UPSC did the same and was there any follow-up action taken by UPSC, including approaching courts or GoI to exempt it from such current requirement under the law?

5- I have been informed that unlike many other public-bodies,UPSC has not fully complied with Hon’ble Supreme Court judgments in CBSE & Anr. versus Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors and Sanjay Singh & Anr. versus UPPCS and related case-law principles ,since these judgments were delivered and consequently UPSC is facing litigation on the same across the country? What minister and UPSC has to say on this?