VISITORS

Sunday, 25 November 2012

FIRST TIME IN HISTORY UPSC HAS PROVIDED ANSWERSHEET OF CSP-2011, AND EVEN IN THAT THEIR FRAUD HAS BEEN CAUGHT.

The CSP-2011 candidate Rajendra Rawat  has been informed by UPSC that he has  scored 1.34 marks (out of 200) in papre-I of CSP-2011 . But, according to ANSWERSHEET(OMR SHEET) and ANSWER KEY provided  by UPSC , he has actually scored 72.67.{ in paper -II  he was informed correct score .i.e.
157.50. so his actual total score comes out to be 231 marks (out of 400) and cut off for his OBC category as informed by UPSC was 175. still he was disqualified in CSP -2011.}

ANSWERSHEETS(OMR SHEET) AND ANSWER-KEYS PROVIDED BY UPSC UNDER RTI ARE GIVEN BELOW:-





FOR MORE DETAILS OF FRAUD GOING ON IN UPSC VISIT FOLLOWING GOOGLE DOCUMENTS:- https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B3Alege3ImJNUnFic2lPY2NUZ2s/edit


SUPPORT OUR CAUSE BY SIGNING FOLLOWING PETITION WHICH WILL BE SENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT:-http://www.change.org/petitions/irregularities-in-the-indian-civil-services-examination

THOSE FRIENDS WHO HAVE SOME CONTACT WITH MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT CAN ASK THEM TO RAISE FOLLOWING QUESTION IN PARLIAMENT:-


Questions to be asked to Minister of Personnel , Public Grievances and Pensions in Parliament of India in context of UPSC’s functioning

Answers of following specific questions is demanded with all the relevant documents—
1-What is the stand of Minister and UPSC head with respect to increased litigation against the institution on transparency & accountability in its Civil Services Examination? Are not they concerned and taking some meaningful corrective actions in the interest of credibility of institution in public-perception?
2-What steps minister and UPSC head has taken to comply with the RTI Act and Public Record Act,passed by this Parliament ,in letter and spirit?
3-Is it correct that under current chairman of UPSC,CIC and courts of higher judiciary has passed adverse strictures against the UPSC for not complying with judgments/orders/directives passed on RTI matters and keep spending the public money on litigation and re-litigation? If this is right then what assurance can be given to make sure that same would not happen again and UPSC will comply with the current jurisdiction of RTI Act and its related case-laws, without judging itself out, as there is no explicit exemption given by Parliament or Executive or Judiciary at the moment?
4-Is it right that irrespective of being asked by National Archives of India(NAI) many times, UPSC refused to send its Record Retention Schedule to NAI for vetting, as required under Public Record Act and Central Secretariat Manual of Office Procedure? On what basis UPSC did the same and was there any follow-up action taken by UPSC, including approaching courts or GoI to exempt it from such current requirement under the law?
5- I have been informed that unlike many other public-bodies,UPSC has not fully complied with Hon’ble Supreme Court judgments in CBSE & Anr. versus Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors and Sanjay Singh & Anr. versus UPPCS and related case-law principles ,since these judgments were delivered and consequently UPSC is facing litigation on the same across the country? What minister and UPSC has to say on this?





39 comments:

  1. Where did you send the RTI application?And what was general format?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. send rti to CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER ,UPSC ALONG WITH TEN RUPEES POSTAL ORDER IN NAME OF ACCOUNTS OFFICER,UPSC.
      THE FORMAT OF RTI APPLICATION IS GIVEN IN OLDER POSTS.PLEASE REFER IT.

      Delete
  2. http://jobs.aglasem.com/?p=5708
    According to another RTI(as evident from above link), cutoff for CSP 2011 was 198(for general category).But, you are stating that UPSC has informed that cut off foe general category is 175.how this is possible???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In 2010 prelims I sure about 110/120 in geography prelims
      (check every question from coaching centre solution and googled every question)in main got 138 in geography 1 and 148 in paperII (no interview call)
      in 2011 mains GEOGRAPHY I 153/ paper II 118 (no CALL)
      in csp 2012 I scored 250/400. I am SC candidate
      I hardly studied a single day for prelims ...IN MAINS 33(yes sir) in paperI and 117paperII

      Delete
  3. You are right friend. the cut off of CSP -2011 for general category was 198. But, the candidate is belonging to OBC category whose cut off according to UPSC was 175.

    ReplyDelete
  4. TSA long live!Please draw the media attention to this himalayan blunder and put the Holy Cow to shame.The past victims will heave a sigh of relief.

    ReplyDelete
  5. fraud is exposed..... now what next?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Friends, we can adopt a multi-pronge strategy. meet MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT and ask them to raise this fraud in parliament, approach media, file PIL in supreme court, spread this movement through social media to galvanise public pressure , send petition to parliamentary committee on Ministry of Personnel and Public Griviences. we have to adopt all strategies. UPSC is so powerful organisation and the master-mind behind such fraud taking place in UPSC since so many years has capacity to influence all these agencies. so unity and well coordinated efforts are our strength.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Please post the course of action to be taken as well as other updates... Thanks !

    ReplyDelete
  8. No wonder!!! I too had the same experience this year :(( I was scoring at least 250 marks(total) in CSP, but COULDN'T qualify for mains exam!!!!!!!!!!! :/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kindly bring this up in mainstream media!!! It would have far greater impact.

    ReplyDelete
  10. hey i am not able to access upsc website since i saw you page from 26th November 1 a.m. similarly my 3 friends also not able to open/access of upsc's web site. are able to open/access it??

    ReplyDelete
  11. Open the site using their IP address....http://203.94.243.90/ .....it will open like a butter...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. why can't we open directly from google search?

      Delete
  12. why can't we open directly from google search?

    ReplyDelete
  13. even i got 027/300 in Psychology Paper 2 where in Paper 1 i got 191/300 :'(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2012 main
      Geography paper 1 033/300
      paper 2 117/300
      2011 main
      Geography paper 1 153/300
      paper 2 118/300

      Delete
  14. http://www.change.org/petitions/irregularities-in-the-indian-civil-services-examination

    ReplyDelete
  15. if u support this cause then please sign the petition whose link is given below, which will be sent to all members of parliament.

    http://www.change.org/petitions/irregularities-in-the-indian-civil-services-examination

    ReplyDelete
  16. Now,upsc is exposed by its own document. but, dont get any kind of positive feeling of justice for rajendra. it is india, yaha sab aese hi chalta hai...

    ReplyDelete
  17. dear, this is reform movement and we will change. we will fight for getting justice to rajendra.

    ReplyDelete
  18. i was expecting 230 plus ,still didnot qualify,it was my last attempt.vikas tyagi

    ReplyDelete
  19. lets approach arvind kejriwal..vikas tyagi phone no 08826619000 delhi

    ReplyDelete
  20. parliament is in session lets approach mps

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This Congress Government only want their kith and kins in Bureaucracy. That's why they are applying crook methods to hire their own people.
    Congress is the worst government and only wants to divide people on vote bank politics and give boost to corruption to destroy our Nation.

    ReplyDelete
  23. is the above matter is in court? can u provide me with some more details related to this case, as my case is very similar to this one.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Why don't you go to the media? For e.g. the citizen journalist in CNN-IBN or any other media house. This is a big crime/mistake from a constitutional body. Though the media themselves are not angels, you can get a lot of public attention and support from then, which is precisely what is needed to tackle the opacity of UPSC.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I am trying to write about this in media.

    Please send me an SMS and/or call me. Just need some confirmation about it. Thanks. No. is 9871***1821***098

    If possible then please don't publish this comment. Just send me the sms or no. of someone among you I can talk to. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I appeared in civil services exam 1983 but could not succed due to faulty system of UPSC.Moreover I was not informed about scaling even my request of re evaluation. can I join your movement agains UPSC.My Mob No is9460054796

    ReplyDelete
  27. There is definitely this kind of maleficence in UPSC. Prelims exam result of 2014 prove the same. i have been clearing prelims for past two years with final marks always more than expected marks. But this year it seems to be happening with a lot of candidates whereby they did not qualify and candidates with low scores have been selected. its a fraud for sure. i am definitely opting for litigation.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Dear @iaspirant of forum ias,
    ATTENTION FOR CSP 2014
    me too have problem with 2014 result .pls check if some digit similar to ur roll no is included because i came to know of few guys having this issue in 2014 csp result example XXXX1223 insteadXXXX1233 etc .even i am finding some disprecancy pls we need to group together IAM UNABLE TO LOGIN IN TO FORUMIAS
    pls contact in my mail id :
    prasad.vilayil@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  29. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  30. can this be a discrepancy my roll no is XXX030 and its not there in selected list however XXX070 is there in list....

    ReplyDelete
  31. There seem to be lot of discrepancies in the prelims results this time. People who hoped to score well have not even cleared the exam while few others whose chances were unexpectedly less, seemed to sail through.

    If you share a similar experience, bring to our notice. Comment below, your expected score and your supporting key. Let us try to bring out the injustice to light if at all something such actually happened.

    There were few incidents even in the past where candidates fell prey to UPSC's opaqueness. Using communication media, we can all easily share our opinions from different parts of the country.

    ‪#‎TransparencyStrife‬ ‪#‎UPSCInjustice‬

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1468985616679523/

      Delete