VISITORS

Saturday, 29 September 2012

CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED AGAINST UPSC CHAIRMAN D.P.AGGARWAL FOR NOT ABIDING BY HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGMENT IN LPA 229/2011


  
   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
 
 
 
  CONT.CAS(C) 661/2012
 
 
 
  ANGESH KUMAR and ORS ..... Petitioner
 
  Through: Mr Pankaj Kumar, Adv.
 
 
 
 
versus
 
 
 
  DHARMA PAL AGGARWAL and ANR. ..... Respondents
 
  Through
 
 
 
  CORAM:
 
   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
 
 
 
   O R D E R
 
   28.09.2012
 
 
 
  CM No. 17166/2012 (Exemption)
 
  Allowed subject to just exceptions.
 
  CONT.CAS.(C) 661/2012
 
  By this contempt petition compliance is sought of the directions
  issued by the Division Bench vide its judgment dated 13.07.2012 passed in
  LPA No. 229/2011 and WP(C) 3316/2011. Briefly, the petitioner has
  sought following information:
 
  ?(i) details of marks (raw and scaled marks) obtained by this
  selected candidates in their respective optional subjects of the Civil
  Services Preliminary Examination , 2010;
 
  (ii) details of the marks (raw and scaled) obtained by the respondents
  themselves in the said examination;
 
  (iii) The cut off marks of each optional subject in the said
  examination.?
 
 
 
 
 
  CONT.CAS(C) 661/2012 Page 1 of 2
 
  It is also brought to my notice that a review was filed qua the
  judgment of the Division Bench, which has also been dismissed.
 
  Learned counsel for respondents says that they propose to file a
  SLP against the aforesaid judgment of this Court.
 
  In view of the above, learned counsel for the respondents
  undertakes to the Court that in case they are not successful in obtaining
  any interim orders in the SLP, which they propose to file within six
  weeks from today, they shall disclose the information as directed by the
  Division Bench.
 
  On this assurance, the contempt petition is disposed of.
 
  List for compliance on 29.11.2012.
 
 
 
 
 
  RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
 
  SEPTEMBER 28, 2012
 
  kk
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  CONT.CAS(C) 661/2012 Page 2 of 2
 
 
 
  $ 33
 
  
 
Search Result For party :ANGESH KUMAR year :2012" are : 1  
S.No.Diary No. / Case No. [STATUS]Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Advocate
Listing Date / Court No.
1.
 CONT.CAS(C)  661/2012
   [PENDING]
ANGESH KUMAR & ORS
Vs.   DHARMA PAL AGGARWAL
Advocate : PANKAJ KUMAR 
Court No. : 7
Last Date:




2 comments:

  1. HAVE U EVER THOUGHT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE THINGS LISTED IN BLOG. THE MAIN CULPRIT ARE CONSULTANTS IN UPSC. THE UPSC IS REAPPOINTING ITS RETIRING OFFICERS AS CONSULTANT FOR EXAMINATION, RECRUITMENT, APPOINTMENT, SERVICES AND ADMINISTRATION. THEY ARE AMENABLE TO INFLUENCE AND ARE PROVIDED A CONVENIENT LEGAL COVER FORGOING EASY ON PREVAILING CORRUPT PRACTICES. THEY ACTUATE TO CORRUPT PRACTICES AND MANEUVER WITH HIGHER ECHELONS IN DIVERS WAY BY CAMOUFLAGE THEIR ACTIVITIES BY BECOMING SYCOPHANTS OR CHRONIES TO SUPERIORS.
    DoPT vide OM No. F.No.160 l2/30/2008-Estt.(Allowance) 8th April, 2009 have categorically stated THAT PROVISIONS AS ENVISAGED IN GFR 2005 SHALL APPLY IN ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANTS. BUT UPSC CONTRAVENED ALL THE RULES AND WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE DUE PROCESS APPOINTING THE CONSULTANTS AND WHAT IS THE LEGAL SANCTITY OF SUCH APPOINTMENT ..................? AS THERE IS NO RULE/MECHANISM IN MINISTRY OF FINANCE TO DEAL WITH SUCH SITUATION AND INITIATE DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ON CONTRAVENTION OF GFR RULES. U CAN VIEW THE UPSC WEBSITE AT http://www.upsc.gov.in/ in telephone directory and will find that all the branches those are come across of IAS aspirants are headed by consultants. The admin, services, recruitment and appointment are head by retired UPSC officers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, we have gone through the upsc telephone directory and found that most of consultants are ex-upsc officers. please explain in details and give some evidence in support of ur claim. u can email the details on our email ids, if they are sensitive. if u really want to expose UPSC u r most welcome.send ur mobile number,if u want to give some sensitive proofs. we will contact u.

      Delete