Poem on Gaplebaj UPSC

Visit to Ralegan Sidddhi.

All this fraud was discussed with Anna. He has promised to write letter to Prime Minister after going through its details.

Systematic manipulation of marks by UPSC in case of Dr.Prashant Chakkarwar.(TAKE HOME MESSAGE: DO ANYTHING WE WILL KEEP YOU OUT OF FINAL LIST BY MISUSING SCALING/MODERATION SYSTEM)

 He had cleared Prelims. in his first attempt, He was just short of 4-5 marks to qualify for interview. In that year manipulation was done by UPSC in his Essay marks. He was awarded only 80 marks (out of 200), inspite of doing quite well in Essay. 
In his 2006 attempt, they have awarded just 69 marks (out of 300) to him in General Studies- II (His scores in same paper in 2004,2005 and 2008 were 124,125 and 134 respectively.) While, he was awarded only 119 marks (Out of 300) in Anthropology- II. (His marks in same paper in 2004,2005 and 2008 were 179,159 and 200 respectively.) Same story was repeated in Public Administration-I paper, where he was awarded only 108 marks (Out of 300) and was systematically kept out of list. 
In his last attempt in 2008 they again awarded 80 marks (out of 200) in Essay and 113 marks (out of 300) in Anthropology- I (My marks in Anthropology- I, in 2004, 2005, 2006 attempts were 139,151,177 respectively). Thus inspite of qualifying for interview, he was again systematically kept out of final selection list.

Manipulation in Essay marks in case of Rejo John. He was candidate of Civil Services Exam 2009. The cut off of General Category for that year was 899.and he was just awarded 09 marks out of 200 in essay, inspite of having very good scores in other subjects.

UPSC accepts that it has spend 105 crore rupees on Civil Services Exam related court cases since 2006

INDIA TODAY exposes fraud in IAS/IPS exam.

Newspaper coverage after Nagpur Press Conference

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/NGO-alleges-fraud-in-UPSC-exams/articleshow/11012749.cms

Printed from

NGO alleges fraud in UPSC exams

TNN | Dec 7, 2011, 01.20AM IST

Tweet

NAGPUR: A Delhi-based NGO, Transparency Seekers for Accountability, has lavelled serious allegations of corruption and fraud in the civil services examinations conducted by the UnionPublic Service Commission (UPSC).


In a press meet at Tilak Patrakar Bhavan, Dhanoli on Tuesday, the NGO informed that many cases were filed in the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court by candidates who have fallen prey to corruption, fraud and deception by UPSC over the years. Cases of destruction of evidence and bogus roll numbers are also there against the UPSC.


"The adamant attitude of UPSC can be gauged from the fact that it has failed to provide photocopy of the answer-sheets to the candidates despite apex court's judgment, in CBSE versus Aditya Bandhopaddhyay case, directing all examination bodies to provide photocopy under the Right to Information ( RTI) Act," claimed Dr Prashant Chakkarwar, convener of the Transparency Seekers for Accountability.


"The entire nation will suffer if a single fraud IAS/IPS officer is selected. There should be transparency in this examination which selects the high ranking officials who contour the fate of the nation," he insisted.

Photos of Press Conference at Nagpur 6/12/2011

Analysis of 2007 Civil Services Main Exam result

Subject (2007 mains)	Number	Mean	Minimum	Maximum	Candidates with marks <= 300	Candidates with marks  > 300	% candidates with marks <= 300	% candidates with marks >300
Agriculture	213	256.59	0	364	195	18	91.55	8.45
Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Science	50	232.23	0	338	46	4	92	8
Anthropology	265	275.53	0	341	203	62	76.60	23.40
Botany	240	266.27	0	381	185	55	77.08	22.92
Chemistry	102	236.87	0	387	85	17	83.33	16.67
Civil Engineering	19	285.65	85	374	15	4	78.95	21.05
Commerce & Accountancy	223	282.40	0	320	153	70	68.61	31.39
Economics	222	283.1	0	374	147	75	66.22	33.78
Electrical Engineering	26	263.87	0	352	17	9	65.38	34.62
Geography	2802	261.96	0	389	2151	651	76.77	23.23
Geology	25	237.35	0	362	16	9	64	36
History	2329	272.78	0	370	1797	532	77.16	22.84
Law	246	264.77	0	362	186	60	75.61	24.39
Lit of Bengali	5	284.6	253	320	4	1	80	20
Lit of Dogri	1	294	294	294	1	0	100	0
Lit of French	2	257.5	257	258	2	0	100	0
Lit. of Arabic Language	1	376	376	376	0	1	0	100
Lit. of Assamese Language	6	299.25	235	333	4	2	66.67	33.33
Lit. of English Language	24	270.66	157	364	16	8	66.67	33.33
Lit. of Gujarati Language	39	282.35	126	348	29	10	74.36	25.64
Lit. of Hindi Language	529	276.79	0	369	422	107	79.77	20.22
Lit. of Kanada Language	52	287.22	0	348	43	9	82.69	17.31
Lit. of Maithili Language	6	333	274	364	3	3	50	50
Lit. of Malyalam Language	32	297.44	185	354	17	15	53.12	46.87
Lit. of Manipuri Language	15	321.9	279	357	3	12	20	80
Lit. of Marathi Language	39	276.36	114	392	28	11	71.79	28.20
Lit. of Oriya Language	6	314	79	360	2	4	33.33	66.67
Lit. of Pali Language	136	273.96	28	368	99	37	72.79	27.21
Lit. of Persian Language	2	262.5	131	394	1	1	50	50
Lit. of Punjabi Language	16	295.54	202	345	11	5	68.75	31.25
Lit. of Sanskarit Language	82	289.69	126	367	54	28	65.85	34.15
Lit. of Tamil Language	248	277.06	72	357	201	47	81.05	18.95
Lit. of Telugu Language	106	288.33	141	365	75	31	70.75	29.25
Lit. of Urdu Language	18	302.4	170	360	7	11	38.89	61.11
Management	13	272.24	169	329	7	6	53.85	46.15
Mathematics	185	231.6	0	389	163	22	88.11	11.89
Mechanical Engineering	77	220.33	66	369	73	4	94.81	5.19
Medical Science	66	268.74	29	379	53	13	80.3	19.7
Philosophy	1123	274.42	0	380	800	323	71.24	28.76
Physics	224	210.39	0	378	208	16	92.86	7.14
Political Science & Intnl. Rel.	809	260.27	0	371	673	136	83.19	16.81
Psychology	980	255.32	0	378	781	199	79.69	20.31
Public Administration	2280	267.97	0	392	1819	461	79.78	20.22
Sociology	960	270.82	0	354	737	223	76.77	23.23
Statistics	7	263.6	0	385	6	1	85.71	14.29
Zoology	357	264.02	0	406	255	102	71.43	28.57

                In case of Inter-Subject Scaling/Moderation ,  When  they says that it is done to bring balance between marks of different subjects it should be reflected in final results. But the case is not so which can be seen by analysis of data of Civil Services (Main) Examination-2007 which  shows that no balance  is achieved between all optional subjects  after applying statistical moderation by Linear Transformation Method as the Mean marks ranges from 210(Physics) to 333(Maithili Literature), Minimum marks ranges from 0 to 376(Arabic literature) , Maximum marks ranges from 258(French literature) to 406 (Zoology).  Thus, the whole process has lost its way in the maze of statistics applied without proper application of mind.